The "Nomadic Learner"
Delving into the “Current State of Mobile Learning” offered disconcertion
at the same time as comfort as I considered my own lack of understanding of
what mobile technology means and read that there is not yet an official
definition. The idea that we are moving
away from possession of knowledge and into a world of getting knowledge as
needed is put rather nicely by John Traxler in the text, “Finding information rather than
possessing it or knowing it becomes the defining characteristic of learning
generally and of mobile learning especially, and this may take learning back
into the community.”[1]I take solace in not having to “know” things,
as memory has always been my intellectual weakness, but imagining trying to
keep up with the vastness of information and means of obtaining information is
quite daunting. As an educator, how
might I harness the power of immediate and global learning while helping
students manage tools and critically think about the information available
everywhere, all the time?
Mobile learning turns my ideas of what we know and discourse
upside down where a reframing is necessary.
Learning and knowledge don’t exist as entities to acquire, but rather as
active pursuits towards context, functionality, empathy and connections. I am excited by the idea of learning as a
fundamental human right and believe that mobile learning holds particular
interest for equity in learning. The
societal hurdles for support of mobile learning aside, linking information and
calling upon our own thinking about thinking fits with recent theories about
how we learn and especially inquiry based learning. “Authentic learning” is used often in the
beginning discussions of mobile learning, and is thrown around in education
circles these days without clarity of what it means. To me, authentic learning exists when an
individual takes ownership of their learning journey and is most likely to
happen when learning is personalized in such a manner as to be comfortable, interesting
and applicable for a student. As Mohamed Ally writes in the first section of The Theory and Practice of Online
Learning, “online learning should have high authenticity, high
interactivity, and high collaboration.”[2] Philosophically, this fits with my personal
ambitions as an educator, particularly in the correlation to critical thinking
skills, but the challenge of how to achieve this learning structure remains.
Mr. Ally’s discussion of the “Schools of Learning” in
relation to psychological theories piqued my interest and provided meaningful
context to mobile learning, as I’m currently looking at behaviorism,
cognitivism and constructivism theories with my psychology students. Taking the best of each and integrating into
one theory, behaviorism provides the “what” of learning in sequential,
conditioned feedback loops. Cognitivism
offers the “how” of learning and depends on thinking and reflection for
synthesis of knowledge. The interpretation
provided from constructivism offers the context, or “why”, of learning so that
we have means to apply knowledge. What I
liked about “Connectivism” learning, besides the mention of chaos (personal
favorite methodology), is the integration of the other three schools of thought
with the added defining factor of ownership.[3] Mr. Ally points to “learning how to learn” as
the underlying foundation for mobile learning.
Given an ideal classroom, I dream of students who sift through the vast
amount of information in order to formulate their own ideas, or “learner
interface” as the book states.[4]
As I proceed into my journey of going global from the
comfort of my own home or classroom, it seems the essential question of how we
make the leap to mobile learning in current models of education is entwined or
perhaps ensnarled with the cultural mindset shifts that must take place for
success. My instinct tells me to go to
the source- students. Students are
already living mobily in many regards.
Students also possess the key to unlocking the difficulties, that is,
they already know what is getting in the way of their own learning in most
cases. Step one, then is finding out
what students see as the right way to pursue mobile learning.
[1] Ally, Mohamed. Mobile
learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Athabasca
University Press, 2009.
I agree with both of you here - the adage "learning to learn" has never been more appropriate. We do have a shifting role in education - from teacher as deliverer of content (solely) to teacher as mediator of learning. The challenge for us becomes greater because now the opportunity and challenge for true differentiation and mapping to students interests and passions is higher than ever before.
ReplyDeleteYou also bring up a good point about where to learn and grow - we will need to build up a set of community resources over the course of this class to help you find places to learn from and share with peers.
Thanks for a well written, deep reflection!